Why was the xcr disqualified




















Quoted: They're pretty goog. I got to fondle a friends XCR and I wasn't very impressed. It was way too front heavy and the cheek weld on the stock was uncomfortable and akward. I've been really pleased with my XCR. I got an early gun and it has been flawless.

A new stock is in the works and will likely be out by end of year. That will solve that problem first laugh i had today, and it was a goodun. I've heard they're really goog No seriously I heard goog things about them. The XCR-L is the only 5. My brother's has run flawlessly and is a joy to shoot.

Takedown for cleaning is a breeze. Push the latch forward and break it open like a shotgun. There are not many parts in the entire gun. The trigger is nice on his, but RobArm has an upgrade out, which is supposed to be even better. I like the folding stock. Simple and rugged. In all, it's a very solid-feeling, reliable, and accurate rifle. Quoted: A new stock is in the works and will likely be out by end of year.

Quoted: Quoted: A new stock is in the works and will likely be out by end of year. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: A new stock is in the works and will likely be out by end of year. Quoted: 2 weeks out on that new XCR stock! I like both of them, but to me the XCR handles better Alex Robinson's updated Daewoo K2! I have handled the XCR and other than being a touch nose heavy for my taste it really is a neat gun. Not a huge fan of rails, so I stick with my Daewoos, but the whole system is pretty simple and well thought out.

The one thing I have noticed is that XCR owners area rabid bunch that is very loyal to the rifle and the company, not unlike MSAR owners, and to me that says a lot- the design of the rifle really works well for a lot of people, and I must say I really think that Mr.

Robinson has just about the ideal features and layout for a conventional layout rifle. But don't get me started on the 'mystery super stock', LOL. I'm probably just too one track minded cause I've always talked up the XCR over the other newer designs based off of stats and what others seem to say and a few weeks ago I was able to shoulder a XCR for the first time and I must admit I wasn't very impressed. I just can't seem to find a better platform in my head then the AR.

Sounds like if you're not using an AR than you're wasting your money at a Pat Rogers course. Wonder what he intends to do when the US Army selects a new carbine?

I have no 1st hand experience with Robinson guns, I'm just posting what Pat posted on Lightfighter. They've always seemed very well received from my limited exposure.

I like my guns sturdy, simple, and ergonomic. And man, that REPR makes me drool uncontrollably To each their own. I have a hard time bashing any rifle, when I think about the hard work and ingenuity that goes into making them. How many of us have ourselves designed a rifle? It's easy to criticize something you either don't understand or had no part in. I try to give all weaponry the respect due. They are very goog!!! So goog infact I bougt one over every rifle in it's class so yeah it's a goog firearm.

DM me if interested. It has a Voltor modstock on it to help with the cheek weld. And I wonder what percentage of AR that have gone through his classes have had issues? Quoted: when I looked through the lightfighter aar's to see what pat said, I believe they were in Quoted: Quoted: when I looked through the lightfighter aar's to see what pat said, I believe they were in Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: when I looked through the lightfighter aar's to see what pat said, I believe they were in Same controls.

Same optics, sling, flashlights, etc. New ammo. Hunters can switch from harvesting feral pigs, to distance work on steel or paper to keeping the godless hordes at bay. Rather than spending all your extra cash on parts, you can spend it on ammo instead. One gun to rule them all? How about this? The Robinson has less parts than its competitors. And lots of room for stuff. Using the five-setting gas system, a shooter can adjust the rifle to use the absolute minimal amount of gas needed to cycle the action.

That means less wear and tear and less fouling come cleaning time. The XCR owner can also shut off the gas system entirely for shooting with a suppressor or single shot operation. You activate the forward assist by pushing in and then forward on the charging handle. The easily-indexed safety controls are ambidextrous. With the magazine release in standard AR configuration, drop-free mag changes are a cinch.

The set-up hearts everything from standard 55 and grain 5. Robinson ships the XCR-L with a standard A2 flash suppressor, though other muzzle attachments are available. After taking up the slack, the second stage breaks at a clean lbs.

The proprietary bolt is a three-lug design that locks onto the barrel extension leaving the upper receiver unstressed. There is no need to check the headspace when changing barrels. A steel fixed ejector is attached to the inside of the receiver, held in place by two bolts.

The ejection pattern is to the two o'clock position of the operator, with an optimum distance of 15ft to 20ft depending on ammunition type and gas setting. Upper and Lower Receiver The upper receiver is made from extruded anodized aluminum, and non-stressed.

It features a non-reciprocating charging handle on left side which also acts as a forward assist. The quad rail system is integrated into the upper receiver and compatible with most picatinny devices. Developments Since its introduction in , the XCR has been refined to address feedback from customers which highlighted areas were the gun needed to be improved. Not only is it more reliable because there are less parts to work loose, but it is also tool-less.

The new heavier design allows the XCR to ignite some newer Wolf 7.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000