J Esthet Restor Dent. Epub Aug 9. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface.
Eur J Oral Sci. The effectiveness of using a patient simulator to teach light-curing skills. Martin FE. A survey of the efficiency of visible light curing units. J Dent. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. Bonding characteristics to dentin walls of class II cavities, in vitro. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
Posterior composite restoration update: focus on factors influencing form and function. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. Wang Y, Spencer P.
Interfacial chemistry of class II composite restoration: structure analysis. J Biomed Mater Res A. Effect of four intermediate layer treatments on microleakage of Class II composite restorations. J Biomed Mater Res. Geurtsen W.
Substances released from dental resin composites and glass ionomer cements. Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. Interactions between resin monomers and commercial composite resins with human saliva derived esterases.
Mutual influence of cholesterol esterase and pseudocholinesterase on the biodegradation of dental composites. Finer Y, Santerre JP. The influence of resin chemistry on a dental composite's biodegradation. Dental restorative biomaterials induce glutathione depletion in cultured human gingival fibroblast: Protective effect of N-acetyl cysteine. Water sorption and solubility of resin-based materials following inadequate polymerization by a visible-light curing system.
J Oral Rehabil. Effects of various resin composite co monomers and extracts on two caries-associated micro-organisms in vitro. Effect of composite resin biodegradation products on oral streptococcal growth. Bergenholtz G. Evidence for bacterial causation of adverse pulpal responses in resin-based dental restorations. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp.
J Oral Pathol. Comparison of pulp responses to resin composites. Oper Dent. Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping. Quintessence Int. Fluid movement across the resin-dentin interface during and after bonding. Enzymatic responses of human deciduous pulpal fibroblasts to dental restorative materials.
Responses of L mouse fibroblasts, primary and immortalized bovine dental papilla-derived cell lines to dental resin components. Geurtsen W, Leyhausen G. Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental resin composites and their flowable derivatives.
Clin Oral Inves. Cytotoxicity of photosensitizerscamphorquinone and 9-fluorenone with visible light irradiation on a human submandibular-duct cell line in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. Cell death effects of resin-based dental material compounds and mercurials in human gingival fibroblasts.
Arch Toxicol. Cytotoxicity of resin monomers on human gingival fibroblasts and Ha Ca T keratinocytes. Effects of light-curing time on the cytotoxicity of a restorative composite resin on odontoblast-like cells.
J Appl Oral Sci. Carboxylesterase expression in human dental pulp cells: Role in regulation of BisGMA-induced prostanoid production and cytotoxicity. Acta Biomater. Independent and combined cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of triethylene glycol dimethacrylate and urethane dimethacrylate. Mol Biol Rep. Genetic and cellular toxicology of dental resin monomers. The mutagenic activity of unpolymerized resin monomers in Salmonella typhimurium and V79 cells. Mutat Res. The induction of micronuclei in vitro by unpolymerized resin monomers.
Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of dental materials in human lymphocytes as assessed by the single cell microgel electrophoresis comet assay. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of resin monomers in human salivary gland tissue and lymphocytes as assessed by the single cell microgel electrophoresis Comet assay.
Induction of DNA strand breaks by dental composite components compared to X-ray exposure in human gingival fibroblasts. Effects of three resin monomers on the cellular glutathione concentration of cultured human gingival fibroblasts.
Cell Biol Toxicol. Differential gene expression involved in oxidative stress response caused by triethylene glycol dimethacrylate. J Endod. Effects of monomers eluted from dental resin restoratives on osteoblast-like cells. HEMA down-regulates procollagen alpha1 type I in human gingival fibroblasts. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate.
Induction of DNA double-strand breaks in primary gingival fibroblasts by exposure to dental resin composites. Bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate induces a broad spectrum of DNA damage in human lymphocytes. Effects of resinous monomers on the odontogenic differentiation and mineralization potential of highly proliferative and clonogenic cultured apical papilla stem cells.
Dent Mat. Long term cytotoxicity of resin-based dental restorative materials. J Oral Rehab. Cytotoxicity of Bis-GMA dental composite before and after leaching in organic solvents. Braz Dent J. European Union. Current status of potential bisphenol toxicity in dentistry.
Gen Dent. Key negatives include their durability — compared to composite and amalgam fillings, glass ionomer fillings lack strength and wear resistance. Thus, in an adult mouth, they are mainly used as temporary restorations to be replaced later. Composite fillings are fillings made of resin and other materials such as powdered glass filler.
Like glass ionomer fillings, they bond to the tooth, providing additional support to the tooth that traditional fillings e. Composite fillings are particularly widely used because of their versatility and aesthetic appeal. Not only can composites be used for a wide range of tasks in our mouths — including chips and breakages — they can be tooth-coloured in order to blend in. For this reason, we only use composites for front teeth or other visible areas. A key positive for composite fillings is its durability.
Blum, I. Consequences of no more linings under composite restorations. Br Dent J , — Download citation. Published : 24 May Issue Date : May Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Advanced search. Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature. Abstract The consequences of no more linings under composite restorations are many and varied. Access through your institution.
Buy or subscribe. Rent or Buy article Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube. References 1. Wilson Authors Igor R. Blum View author publications. View author publications. Rights and permissions Reprints and Permissions. About this article. Cite this article Blum, I.
0コメント